header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 10 September 2021

10 September 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7947 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
56833
Ian Smith serves up some employment classics & shares some wise lessons from the past
  • Amdocs Systems Ltd v Langton UKEAT/0093/20: a lesson for employers on permanent health insurance schemes.
  • Edinburgh Mela Ltd v Purnell UKEAT/0041/19: construing ‘deteriment’ in whistleblowing cases.
  • Jefferson (Commercial) LLP v Westgate UKEAT/0128/12: the wide nature of the ultimate test for fairness of a dismissal, in a case of high-end employment.

‘Old ones, but good ones’. This is not used here in the context of your humble author’s awful line in jokes, but in relation to the issues raised in the three cases considered this month. They are all well known ones to any employment lawyer worth their salt (though hopefully cutting down on their intake thereof for health reasons), but still merit attention when judicially considered or even reconsidered in recent case law. The first case takes us on a trip down memory lane into permanent health insurance schemes and their often less-than-obvious legal implications. The second makes some interesting points on what ‘detriment’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll