header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 9 February 2017

09 February 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7733 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7733_smith

Ian Smith provides a round-up of the latest notable employment law developments

  • The workings of the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 (given added complication by elements of fraud and insolvency).
  • When gross misconduct (meriting summary dismissal) can arise from gross negligence.
  • How the exercise of a contractual mobility clause fits into redundancy law.

As a matter of strict precedent, employment lawyers tend to be wary of placing too much emphasis on decisions at employment tribunal level, but there are occasions where such decisions can start to show the way the judicial wind is blowing, especially where they are newsworthy. Three months ago we saw the tribunal decision in the Uber taxi case, holding two Uber drivers to be “workers” for the purpose of minimum wage and working time rights. The companion case of Dewhurst v City Sprint (UK) Ltd Case no 2202512/2016 (5 January 2017) concerning a cycle courier working in London has now also been heard at first instance, again establishing “worker” status and hence entitlement to statutory holidays. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll