header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 12 December 2025

12 December 2025 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8143 / Categories: Features , Employment , Whistleblowing , Liability
printer mail-detail
238294
In the spirit of togetherness, Ian Smith rounds off the year with a look at precedent across the UK jurisdictions, umbrella companies & vicarious liability
  • The Supreme Court held that appellate courts across the UK should show respect but not deference to decisions from other jurisdictions.
  • The Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed that umbrella company employment arrangements can be genuine and enforceable.
  • The Court of Appeal was bound to follow precedent in allowing employers to be vicariously liable for detriments amounting to dismissal by fellow employees.

Employment law is usually quite well insulated from the remainder of civil law, but occasionally a case in another area has knock-on effects. This has happened this last month with the decision of the Supreme Court in R (on the application of Jwanczuk) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2025] UKSC 42, which actually concerned social security law, but in which the court took the opportunity to review the whole question of the relationship between the superior courts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll