header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 13 May 2020

13 May 2020 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
20590
As the shutters & umbrellas close at Carluccio’s, Ian Smith reflects on how the current emergency is starting to throw up case law on areas of potential conflict with standard tenets of employment law

In brief

  • Variation of contract and the government furloughing scheme.
  • Re-engagement if not the best candidate for the available job.
  • Duty to make reasonable adjustments and its application to electronic working.

The last month has seen further specific legislation to deal with the coronavirus emergency, in particular amending the rules on statutory sick pay again to deem very vulnerable people in preventive lockdown to be incapable of work and providing that furloughed employees on 80% of earnings can count their previous earnings if claiming statutory maternity pay, statutory paternity pay, statutory shared parental pay or statutory parental bereavement pay. This emergency is also starting to throw up case law on areas of potential conflict (or at least awkward overlaps) with standard tenets of employment law. The first case here is one such,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll