header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 11 August 2023

11 August 2023 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
133399
Before taking refuge in his beach hut, Ian Smith serves up a summer smorgasbord of Parliament, bias & demotion
  • Restricted rights in disciplinary hearings.
  • Continuation of the employment relationship; applying Hogg v Dover College.
  • Apparent bias and post-hearing conduct of a side member.

It has been a busy month on the legislative front. First, the Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act 2023 came into force on 24 July. It operates entirely by way of amendments to the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996).

Secondly, the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 received royal assent. Its changes to existing law are that the employer will have to deal with a request within two months (unless an extension is agreed); an employee will be able to make two requests within a 12-month period; the employer will not be able to refuse a request until it has consulted the employee; and the employee will no longer have to explain what effects they think the change would have and how they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll