header-logo header-logo

Employment

08 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Sivanandan and others v Hackney London Borough [2013] EWCA Civ 22, [2013] All ER (D) 234 (Jan)

The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (CLIA 1978) was concerned, as the title indicated, with the notion of one tortfeasor recovering contribution from another tortfeasor, or from other tortfeasors, liable in respect of the same damage, whether jointly with him or otherwise. CLIA 1978 did not deal with the allocation, as between different tortfeasors, of different degrees of responsibility to the claimant for the damage suffered. As the Employment Appeal Tribunal pointed out, it was not settled at present whether the employment tribunal had jurisdiction over contribution claims, or whether there would have to be separate contribution proceedings in the county court.

The decision in Way [2005] ICR 1362 had been cited as recognising the existence of a discretion exercisable by the ET either (a) to apportion liability for the total sum awarded to a claimant as between the different respondents to a claim, or (b) to make a joint and several award under which each respondent would be liable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll