header-logo header-logo

Employment

16 February 2012
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 1, [2012] All ER (D) 49 (Feb)

The starting point in determining whether s 94(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applied and whether the facts were sufficient to take a case out of the general rule that the place of employment was decisive, was that the employment relationship had to have a stronger connection with Great Britain than with the foreign country where the employee worked. The open ended language of s 94(1) left room for some exceptions to the general rule where the connection with Great Britain was sufficiently strong to show that that could be justified. It would always be a question of fact and degree as to whether the connection was sufficiently strong to overcome the general rule that the place of employment was decisive.

The question whether, on given facts, a case fell within the scope of s 94(1) was a question of law, but was also a question of degree. The reason why an exception could be made in some cases was that the connection between Great

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll