header-logo header-logo

Employment

10 November 2011
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Kay v Cheadle Royal Healthcare Ltd t/a Affinity Healthcare UKEAT/0060/11/CEA, [2011] All ER (D) 05 (Nov)

It was well established that tribunals should concentrate on the question of whether it was reasonable in the circumstances to dismiss the employee whose claim was under consideration, and should treat arguments based on disparity with care. There would not be many cases where the evidence supported the proposition that there were other cases which were truly similar, or sufficiently similar, to afford an adequate basis for arguing that there had been a disparity. Such an argument was only likely to succeed if it could be shown that the tribunal’s evaluation of the evidence before it had been perverse, which was essentially a complaint about the tribunal’s findings of fact.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll