header-logo header-logo

EMPLOYMENT

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

YMCA Training v Stewart [2007] IRLR 185

In determining whether the requirements of step one of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure are met, it is necessary to look beneath the parties’ own labels and focus on whether the substantive requirements of the statute were met.

Tribunals must not be distracted by the fact that the parties may have been following an internal procedure with more elaborate requirements, and different terminology, from those required by the statute. It does not matter that the requirements of both step one and step two are addressed in the same letter. The statutory procedure permits the employer to present its case in two stages—stating the grounds first and supplying the basis for them later—but it does not oblige the employer to do so.

Employers may state both the grounds for the contemplated action and the basis of those grounds at the same time. It is inherent in the requirements of step two that the employer should not announce any decision until the employee has had the opportunity to put their case at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll