header-logo header-logo

EMPLOYMENT

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council v Pratt [2007] All ER (D) 19 (Jan)

Employees can choose to use the modified statutory grievance procedure if they are no longer in employment.

HELD For the purposes of step one of the modified grievance procedure, an employee must set out in his statement the essential reasons why he holds his grievance, in sufficient detail to enable the employer to respond. Where the employee knows as much as or more than the employer, eg where the grievance relates to harassment or bullying, the employee will be expected to set out his account in reasonable detail, informing the employer of the important matters which the employer should investigate and consider.

Where the employee may not have full access to the facts, but suspects that certain facts exist, it will be sufficient that the written statement identifies in reasonable detail why he holds those suspicions. In considering whether the statutory requirements have been met, a tribunal will not necessarily expect the original basis of grievance to be as detailed as the subsequent claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll