header-logo header-logo

05 August 2010
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Employers unsure on default retirement

Business representatives have warned the decision to scrap the Default Retirement Age will raise “complex legal and employment questions”.

Business representatives have warned the decision to scrap the Default Retirement Age (DRA) will raise “complex legal and employment questions”.
The government has said it will phase out the DRA from 6 April 2011. All accompanying statutory retirement procedures, such as the right of employees to request to work beyond their retirement age, will be removed. 

Employers will continue to be able to justify objectively a compulsory retirement age  as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
John Cridland, CBI deputy director-general, says that scrapping the DRA will leave a vacuum, and raise a large number of complex legal and employment questions, which the government has not yet addressed, creating uncertainty among employers and staff, who do not know where they stand. “There will need to be more than a code of practice to address these practical issues,” he says.

Stephen Riley, director of specialist recruiters Intapeople, says the decision to abandon the DRA could have major repercussions for the UK’s younger workers. “A typical scenario after a senior member of staff retires is that a colleague is promoted  and a junior-level worker is brought on board. Any delay in this process puts additional pressure on the government to find new ways of encouraging business growth and creating jobs for our younger population.” (Read more)

Issue: 7429 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll