header-logo header-logo

Empathy pays dividends, banks discover

14 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail
Banks need to rethink their complaints handling and use a more ‘human touch’ if they are to avoid repeating the mistakes of the 2008 financial crisis, an independent dispute resolution body has advised

A live pilot has been ongoing since the end of 2019, where banks make efforts to understand the personal circumstances of each SME, appoint a customer champion to each case to help customers identify the most important documents, and take account of their preferred means of communication. It has taken on board more than 40 complaints from SMEs so far, some stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.

The Business Banking Resolution Service (BBRS), a coalition of seven banks and other stakeholders who are running the pilot, published its interim findings in a report this week. It concluded that the findings indicate that the system needs to be reformed to take the stress and acrimony out of disputes.

According to the report, ‘the BBRS team initially focusses on conversations by phone to interact with customers and learn about the individual complaints, rather than burdening customers with filling in lengthy complaint forms at the very outset.

‘The emphasis is on balancing the need for collecting enough vital information about the complaint as early as possible while not losing the human touch and treating customers with empathy.’ The team also recognises the extra stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the devastating impact this is having on business activity.

Lewis Shand Smith, the BBRS independent Chair, said: ‘It has never been more important for British businesses to get fair treatment from their banks.

‘Doing so will, in turn, safeguard the reputation of the sector. The BBRS will play a vital role in making sure this happens. In establishing our service, we have recognised the need for a deep rethink of the way disputes between SMEs and their banks are handled.

‘The live pilot is adopting a human and flexible approach, as an alternative to the stress and cost of seeking to resolve complaints through the courts.’

Alexandra Marks, Chief Adjudicator at the BBRS, said: ‘We have been discovering a lot about some difficult and often distressing cases, and the importance of handling these sensitively as well as fairly.

‘When dealing with disputes it is not possible to please everyone all of the time, but our ambition as an independent organisation is to reach fair and reasonable outcomes which bring closure to both parties.’

Find out more at: https://thebbrs.org.

Read the report, ‘Live pilot: interim findings’, at: https://staging-thebbrs.kinsta.cloud/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BBRS_Live_Pilot_Interim_Report_15_05_2020.pdf.

 

Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll