header-logo header-logo

08 June 2017
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Electoral whiplash

Politicians offered little hope for claimant lawyers on whiplash reform in their manifestos.

The Conservative manifesto pledged to ‘reduce insurance costs for ordinary motorists by cracking down on fraudulent and exaggerated whiplash claims’. The government’s Prisons and Courts Bill, which was dropped owing to lack of Parliamentary time after the election was called, could therefore be revived. It banned insurers from making offers to settle whiplash claims without medical evidence, introduced tariffs for whiplash injuries lasting between 0 to 24 months, and raised the threshold for personal injury claims in the small claims court from £1,000 to £5,000.

Both the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru support the Conservative’s measures, with the exception of Lib Dem opposition to the small claims limit. Lord Marks, Lib Dem justice spokesperson, told NLJ: ‘We think the raising of the small claims limit to £5,000 is too widely drawn. It should not cover damages for injury sustained otherwise than in road traffic accidents, for example, employer’s negligence or breach of statutory duty, claims against local authorities or occupiers, nuisance claims or assault claims.’

Labour’s manifesto did not mention the issue.

However, UKIP justice spokesman Peter Jewell said: ‘Unlike the Tories, UKIP are not going to pander to powerful lobbying by insurers to make life impossible for claimants.

‘We will reintroduce means tested legal aid for personal injury claimants and wholly disagree with the proposals. They would render most personal injury claims (which can involve considerable pain and suffering for the claimant) impracticable for most claimants as most claims of this nature are between £1,000–£5,000 in value and the insurers are aware of this.’

Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll