header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Economic downturn sparks panel recruitment drive

More panel members appointed as employment disputes rise

Employment tribunals struggling to cope with the deluge of claims created by the economic downturn are to be given extra help after a major recruitment drive.

The lord chancellor has approved 341 new appointments of panel members to employment tribunals. At tribunal, employment disputes are heard by a panel comprising an employment judge and two impartial panel members, one each with “employer” and “employee” experience. Panel members must have an understanding of employment law and experience of dealing with grievances and other workplace issues.

Jeremy Nixon, employment partner at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says the number of employment disputes had certainly increased. “In an environment where people are dismissed from one job and immediately go into another, they are less inclined to go to the time, expense and hassle of pursuing a claim before a tribunal. Where jobs are scarce, the opposite is true and people may well bring claims before the tribunal.

“Economists say that unemployment is a lagging indicator of economic activity. If this is right and unemployment continues at a high level then the number of tribunal claims will also remain high for a few years to come.”
Kevin Sadler, chief executive of the Tribunals Service says: “Employment tribunals have been under pressure in the last year, as we would expect in more difficult economic conditions.

“But the Tribunals Service is coping well with the higher workload and we have significantly increased the number of cases of which we have successfully disposed. We’re also providing more resources. Thirty five employment judges were recruited last year, the new panel members will increase our capacity and further fee paid judges are being recruited.

“These new members will help to ensure each case is fair and unbiased by providing added insight into employee/employer relations, helping the tribunal to come to its decision.”
 

Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll