header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

Economic downturn impacting on magic circle firms

Profession reduces headcount and knuckles down to ride out recession

The credit crunch is biting into the Magic Circle, with Linklaters’ announcement this week that it is to cut jobs for up to 120 junior lawyers in its London office.

Trainee solicitors will not be affected, the firm said, although there could be up to 150 redundancies among support staff.

Linklaters managing partner Simon Davies said: “There have been significant changes in the financial markets and the wider economy. This has affected the clients we serve.

“We are acting now to reduce our headcount in order to meet anticipated demand. It is vital that the firm is in the best shape to meet the challenges which lie ahead. This action is taken reluctantly and after a great deal of careful thought.”

Linklaters, the second largest law firm in the world, employs more than 500 partners and 3,000 fee-earners.

Last month, Clifford Chance announced it had begun a redundancy consultation that would lead to 70–80 fee earners in its London office losing their jobs.

Allen & Overy is holding redundancy consultations in its Hong Kong office, with 10 lawyers’ jobs potentially affected. A spokesperson said the firm was restructuring the office after seven partners left at the end of last year.

On whether the firm might see further redundancy consultations, the spokesperson said: “Our approach is we can’t rule anything out, no-one here has a crystal ball.”

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer said it currently had no redundancy consultations planned.

The firm is running a two-week, 90-session internal communications programme for everyone in its London office, to encourage people to improve their knowledge of business areas outside their own.

A spokesperson said: “With the business landscape changing so rapidly, it is even more crucial for us to stay close to our clients, and to be able to develop our offering to meet their changing needs.”

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll