header-logo header-logo

The "Economic activities" VAT test

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A training centre was engaged in economic activities despite its charitable purpose and therefore liable to pay VAT, the Court of Appeal has held.

In Longridge on the Thames v HMRC [2016] EWCA Civ 930, the Court considered whether VAT was payable on the construction of a training centre for outdoor activities which worked with young people and charged users according to ability to pay. The training centre, Longridge, sought to recover £135,000 worth of VAT that it had paid on the construction, on the grounds the building would be used for charitable purposes.

HMRC contended that Longridge was engaged in business activities. It argued that, according to European Court of Justice caselaw, the test for determining whether there is economic activity and therefore VAT payable is whether there is a “direct link between the service the recipient receives and the payment which he makes, not on the wider context in which the payment is made”.

The Court of Appeal agreed with HMRC, even though payments to Longridge did not reflect the full cost of the service.

Delivering the lead judgment, Lady Justice Arden said: “Economic activity is assessed objectively and so the concern of Longridge, which is its reason for providing the services which it does provide, is not enough to convert what would otherwise be economic activity into an activity of a different kind for VAT purposes.”

Issue: 7713 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll