header-logo header-logo

Easements

22 November 2013
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Evans v Wimbledon & Putney Commons Conservators [2013] EWHC 3411 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 110 (Nov)

It was established law that the defendant had power to grant an easement over the commons for the benefit of adjoining land provided the easement did not interfere with the ability of members of the public to continue to enjoy the part of the common over which the easement was granted and provided, too, that the easement granted was consistent with the duties of the defendant as specified in the Act and the overall objectives of the Act. Accordingly, rights which were granted by the defendant which had as their aim the maintaining and preserving of such an easement had to be permissible, subject to the same qualifications. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll