header-logo header-logo

Duty & dignity

03 June 2022 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
83620
Michael L Nash shares his reflections on a remarkable reign

The powers and privileges of the British sovereign are many and various, and they derive from a multiplicity of sources. Those who criticise the exercise of these powers often do not know their origin, or how and why they are used. Queen Elizabeth II’s reign has not been without its controversies and scandals—Queen Victoria had her fair share and still came out on top. Why have these controversies arisen?

The answer lies in the nature of our constitution: lex scripta and lex non scripta, laws written and laws unwritten. In most other major European monarchies, the parameters of the powers and privileges of the sovereign are clearly defined in the constitution, which is found in one written document, and which began at one definite point in that nation’s history.

One must also remember the memories of powers exercised (generally without any question) in the dynasties from which they have come, and there have been quite a number of such dynasties.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll