header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Caroline East
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Ducks in a row

nlj_7739_east

The Brewster case has bolstered public sector pension rights of unmarried couples, but it is better to be prepared, says Caroline East

  • Administrators of public sector pension schemes should not discriminate unfairly on grounds of marital status.
  • Secretary of State for Work and Pensions concerned that a change in the law would see full retrospective pension benefits being granted to civil partners.

In certain circumstances, a cohabitee may be able to claim a survivor’s pension on the death of his/her partner. Such was the case of Denise Brewster who lived with her partner, William McMullan, for approximately ten years. They became engaged on 24 December 2009 but sadly Mr McMullan died unexpectedly two days later.

Mr McMullan had been employed by Translink, a public transport operator, for about 15 years (up until his death) and had contributed to the Local Government Pension Scheme throughout that time. The scheme was governed by the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/3093).

The administrators of the scheme denied Ms Brewster access to a survivor’s pension

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll