header-logo header-logo

04 July 2009 / Jennifer James
Issue: 7372 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Ducking the bill

Jennifer James on lies, damned lies & expenses claims

The Insider has been following the scandal of MPs' expenses claims with bated breath. As treasurer of the Young Solicitors' Group (YSG) way back in the Dark Ages, I was tasked with scrutinising expenses claims and can vouch for the fact that it does not improve one's popularity one iota.

I have been trying to track down the Parliamentary equivalent of YSG Treasurer, the person responsible for checking these claims. Typing “oversight” into Google simply brings up a plethora of bleats along the lines of “I claimed for a fully equipped hovercraft to cross the moat at my second home due to oversight; as soon as the papers got wind of it…I mean, as soon as my error was pointed out to me, I repaid the money”.

Coming clean

Some of the claims are worthy of Marie Antoinette (summer-house for the ducks, anyone?) some are probably inept rather than bent (Gordon Brown paying his brother, a senior executive with EDF Energy, some £6,000-odd for cleaning services is apparently due to the fact that bro was paying the cleaner direct and then billing Gormless Gordon for his share) but some are definitely worthy of the “F” word.

Not “F'ing Nora! £18m for bookshelves?” F is for Fraud and if anyone outside Parliament had claimed £13,000 towards mortgage payments on a property no longer in mortgage, they would be expecting a visit from the boys in blue. It remains to be seen whether those within the Palace of Westminster whose Swiss-cheese like brains apparently enabled them to “forget” having paid off a mortgage while claiming expenses for it, will be charged with anything.

Premier league

You may remember that David Mills, the estranged husband of British Olympics minister, Tessa Jowell, was sentenced to four and half years in jail for taking a bribe of $600,000 (£387,000) from Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi so that Silvio could avoid conviction on corruption charges and hang on to “huge profits made from the conclusion of illicit corporate and financial operations”.

Ms Jowell has always asserted that she knew nothing about the money even though it was used to pay off a mortgage, something one would normally expect a loving husband and wife to rejoice about together. The fact that they separated some days after this all came to light may show that she knew nothing about it and was rightly incensed; certainly it appears that the police took her word for it and she has never been implicated as anything more than a remarkably incurious spouse.

If the authorities are prepared to take her word over such a large sum, logic must surely suggest that, if MPs' and ministers now state they “forgot” this and that, or that claims for far smaller sums were a mere “oversight” it is hard to see how their word cannot be taken at face value without some very fast footwork and double standards coming into play.

Privy to the scandal

I have been lucky enough to secure an advance copy of some forthcoming material to be printed in next week's Daily Telegraph newspaper, regarding MPs' expenses claims, and it makes shocking reading. The roll-call is long and dishonourable; only the names have been changed to protect the guilty.

The dishonours list

Dirk Drapolene (Lab: East Grim Oop North) Two tickets to Tosca at the Royal Opera House, Scarborough—£500.00 (MP's annotation: I 'ad to take the missis to summat cultural after she saw that Cranford on telly. Bloody awful it were —'ole bloody thing were in Italian. I was in that Italy after the war. Bloody awful it were, every meal ravi-bloody-oli. It's worse than that France, at least y'can get chips there.)

Major Harold Essington-Smythe (Con: Cosyshire) Plasma screen television, Home Cinema System, Hi-Fi, two “La-Z-Boy” massage recliners in faux zebra hide, de luxe model wine cooler, two cases of Lambrini £35,000 (MP's note: Do what you can, dear heart. I simply cannot be seen in “that” kind of cinema and one must have some entertainment, don't you know?)

Hortense Whittlebury (Green Stop The Drax Power Station, free school milk Alliance) The entire Spring collection from Ghost, £15,000 (MP's note: I simply MUST wear ethically-sourced cloth, dear heart, of course, one WOULD go vintage, but with one's eczema, if it's ever been washed in biological powder, and of course there's the child labour issue. Do help, there's an angel.)

Dwayne Pipe (BNP: Home Counties) 5-by-10-foot poster of Enoch Powell, 10-by-15 foot Oswald Mosley ditto, small engraved cigarette case with image of Adolf Hitler, one copy of Windows for Dummies, one adult literacy course, £5,000 (MPs note: Fanks for the picshures, they looks grate in my orfice. Yu can proberly rite off the litracy corse, when I got darn there it wuz in the Nelson Mandela center!!! No word of a lie, guvnor! Yu coudn't make vis stuff up!!!)

Issue: 7372 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll