header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Legal News , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

DTI to overhaul dispute resolution

The 2004 employment dispute resolution procedures could be abolished under new government proposals.

The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) launched a root-and-branch review last week, following the independent review Better Dispute Resolution by Michael Gibbons, which was published on the same day.

Gibbons, chair of Hertfordshire Family Mediation Service, commends a “greatly increased use of mediation” in employment disputes, and he notes: “Employment tribunals process a wide variety of claims, from simple wage claims worth less than £100 to very complex discrimination cases with unlimited damages.

“Yet all cases that do not settle and are not resolved go to a judicial hearing. The costs to parties and the state can be highly disproportionate to the value of the claim.”

The current statutory procedures, which have proved unpopular with many employment lawyers, have had “unintended consequences that outweighed their benefits”, according to Gibbons.

The DTI wants to introduce a more streamlined dispute process.
 
Proposals under consideration in Success at Work: Resolving Disputes in the Workplace include:

  • repealing the statutory dis­missal and grievance procedures;
  • abolishing
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll