header-logo header-logo

07 June 2012
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Driving up insurance costs

OFT reports that motor insurance practices may be inflating premiums

Motor insurers may be driving up the costs of premiums by as much as £225m a year by exploiting revenue-generating opportunities in the system, an Office of Fair Trading (OFT) report has found.

The problems stem from the fact the at-fault driver’s insurer must pay for repairs and replacement vehicles yet has little control over who does the work or how much it costs.

Typically, the OFT suggests, not-at-fault drivers inflate the costs of the other side by about £560 because: insurers refer drivers to credit hire organisations that charge higher daily rates for a replacement car in exchange for a referral fee of between £250 and £400 per car hire; and drivers receive replacement vehicles for longer than necessary.

The cost of repairs may also be inflated by about £155 because certain insurers receive referral fees and rebates from repairers, paint suppliers and parts suppliers, while some insurers have agreements in place where repairers are allowed to charge higher labour rates when repairing the vehicles of not-at-fault drivers.

The OFT, which published its report last week, has provisionally decided to refer the private motor insurance market to the Competition Commission, and will reach a final decision by October.

Charlotte Hardie, road traffic accident supervisor at Glaisyers Solicitors, says: “What the OFT has unveiled is that the issue of personal injury referral fees is not the only problem.”

Hardie says making the Association of British Insurers’ (ABI) general terms agreement—a voluntary agreement between insurers and hire companies to pre-agree hire costs—mandatory might bring premiums down.

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) responds: “Insurers have finally been caught with their hands in the cookie jar.”

APIL president Karl Tonks says: “For years, the insurance industry has sought to blame anyone and anything but itself and its own sharp practices for high insurance premiums.”

However, Nick Starling, the ABI director of general insurance, welcomes the OFT report.

“Regulation of all players in the market to tackle excessive costs is needed, and we hope that the work by the Competition Commission will bring much needed reforms that in turn will result in lower car insurance premiums for consumers.”

Issue: 7517 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll