header-logo header-logo

Drivers claim victory over Uber

20 December 2018
Issue: 7822 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Uber drivers are workers rather than self-employed, the Court of Appeal has confirmed, in the latest triumph for people working in the gig economy.

The decision means drivers James Farrar and Yaseen Aslam, who brought the case, are entitled to holiday pay, paid rest breaks and the minimum wage. The ruling, in Uber BV v Aslam & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2748, that the drivers are ‘workers’ under the Employment Rights Act 1996, upholds earlier employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions.

The drivers had claimed holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and under-payments of the minimum wage. One claimant claimed he had suffered detriment for being a whistleblower, in breach of Part V of the 1996 Act. 

Uber has been granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue: 7822 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll