header-logo header-logo

22 February 2012
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Door to shut on aggressive bailiffs

MoJ to ensure greater regulation of bailiffs

Aggressive bailiffs could be kept in check by new laws proposed by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

Its consultation paper, Transforming bailiff action, proposes legally binding reforms to create minimum entry standards and a certification process to ensure bailiffs are fit to operate. The paper also looks at remodelling the debtor’s complaints process; clarifying the circumstances under which a bailiff can enter property, what force they can use and what they can take; and clarifying the fees that they can charge.

It sets out unacceptable bailiff behaviour, such as misrepresenting their legal authority, threatening the use of force, inappropriately entering a property, seizing disproportionately valuable goods, and charging excessive fees.

Currently, there are no national standards for bailiffs or formal legal protection from heavy-handed tactics.

However, Gillian Guy, chief executive at Citizens Advice, says: “This review falls far short of protecting people in financial difficulty from the excessive and unfair practices carried out by bailiffs.

“While the re-coding of the law on bailiffs is welcome, without an independent regulatory body to oversee the bailiff industry, these reforms are unlikely to deal with the serious problems that we continue to see. We’re also disappointed at proposals which will lead to a massive increase in bailiff fees for enforcing council tax debts. Almost 70% of enquiries Citizens Advice Bureaux receive about bailiffs relate to council tax debt.

“The review does nothing to stop bailiffs in England increasing their fees for families already in dire straits from £42.50 to over £300.”

The consultation will close on 14 May.

Issue: 7502 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll