header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Oliver Assersohn
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Don't mis-sell & don't be unfair!

Oliver Assersohn examines the significance of the FSA's message

* * * * * *

At the beginning of the year the Financial Services Authority (FSA) found that Pacific Continental Securities UK Limited (PCS) had failed to conduct its business with integrity, in breach of principle 1 of the FSA's Principles of Business. One of the findings was that PCS had permitted advisers to continue to engage in inappropriate selling practices despite awareness of those failings.

“The bible”

The selling practices were described in a manual known as “the bible” which was provided by PCS to advisers and which contained suggested ways of overcoming customers' objections.

For example, if a customer wanted to talk to his wife the recommended approach was to say: “If you want me to call you back so you can ask your wife if you can buy the stock, I'll ring mine and see if I can sell it to you, in all seriousness…”

If the customer was unsure about whether to proceed with the trade

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll