header-logo header-logo

Don't get wasted!

21 May 2009 / Allan Reason , Ben Fairhead
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Costs , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Allan Reason & Ben Fairhead highlight the dangers of acting without requisite authority

* * * * * *

The need to ensure that a corporate client provides proper authority to a firm of solicitors to act in proceedings is a point that can be easily overlooked, despite it being of crucial importance. A recent application for costs serves as a powerful illustration of what can happen when a firm acts without establishing the existence of that authority.

Recent scenario

The story starts in 2001 when a company (Company JV), until that point controlled exclusively by an individual (Mr K) at board and shareholder level, became a joint venture company. This followed the sale by one of the other companies controlled by Mr K (Company A) of its shareholding in Company JV to a separate company (Company B). Company B was a member of a different group of companies managed by a Mr D. Mr K and Mr D became the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll