header-logo header-logo

03 May 2018 / Andy Ellis
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Don’t fear the spreadsheet

nlj_7791_elliss

Andy Ellis takes the pain out of electronic billing

  • From 6 April 2018, bills for Part 7 claims must be submitted in electronic spreadsheet form.
  • Law firms that adapt can reap the benefits.

Bills for detailed assessment in Part 7 claims must be submitted in electronic spreadsheet form for work carried out after 6 April 2018—and if that amendment to the CPR doesn’t get readers’ pulses racing, nothing will.

For the wider costs community, as Mr Justice Birss has explained, surrendering to Excel equates to ‘being dragged kicking and screaming into the 1980s’. The more pertinent question then is not, ‘Why is this needed?’ but ‘Why has it taken so long?’

The reassuring news for practitioners whose heads are already hitting the desk at this point is that they probably need to know little about the mechanics of the new electronic bill. Those who are sanguine about the merits of pivot tables and the benefits of xml schema can safely remain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll