header-logo header-logo

Domestic violence laws should protect victims

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

News

Family lawyers claim new laws designed to punish perpetrators of domestic abuse may reduce the likelihood of offences being reported.
From 1 July this year, the
Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004 makes breach of a non-molestation or occupation order a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment—currently it is a civil offence.
Resolution says the change may deter victims from reporting attacks or taking action if they know the perpetrator could end up with a criminal record.  
Jane McCulloch, Resolution’s vice chair, says: “We are in no way playing down the devastating effects of domestic violence in all its forms. Neither are we questioning the good intentions of the legislators. But, first and foremost, the law should protect the victim rather than punish the perpetrator.”  

McCulloch adds that the Act gives the criminal court the power to make restraining orders for any violent offence, even on acquittal. “The risk here is that, even when acquitted, the alleged perpetrator could be kept away from the family home with devastating effects on family relationships,” she says.
However, Baroness Scotland QC, the minister responsible for domestic violence issues, defended the legislation saying domestic violence must stop.

“We have more to do to urge women that the help is out there and they must come forward if they are a victim of this heinous crime,” she says.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll