header-logo header-logo

DOLS in the doldrums

31 July 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The rights against deprivation of liberty of people who lack mental capacity and are in supported living are to be reviewed by the Law Commission.

People in hospitals and care homes have the protection of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), which allow them to be deprived of their liberty if it is in their best interests. However, DOLS do not apply to those in supported living.

The Commission will review this discrepancy, create a new legal framework and provide the government with information to improve DOLS.

DOLS have come under fire from several quarters, including a House of Lords Select Committee in March, which found the safeguards “not fit for purpose”.

Liverpool solicitor Peter Edwards said: “I do not believe DOLS are an effective protection.

“They could be, if worked on, and it’s a relief that the Law Commission is looking at both areas [DOLS and the need for protection for those in supported living].”

The meaning of “deprivation of liberty” for those who lack mental capacity was broadened by Baroness Hale in the Supreme Court case of Cheshire West [2014] UKSC 19.

Edwards said that procedures to deprive people of their liberty were set out by DOLS, but that an appeal would take about a year and cost £30,000-£50,000. For people in supported living, permission needs to be sought from the Court of Protection before they can be deprived of liberty—a cumbersome process.

“What we need is a clear procedure with lots of safeguards where an individual can appeal through a cheap, accessible tribunal mechanism,” he said.

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll