header-logo header-logo

DOLS in the doldrums

31 July 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The rights against deprivation of liberty of people who lack mental capacity and are in supported living are to be reviewed by the Law Commission.

People in hospitals and care homes have the protection of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), which allow them to be deprived of their liberty if it is in their best interests. However, DOLS do not apply to those in supported living.

The Commission will review this discrepancy, create a new legal framework and provide the government with information to improve DOLS.

DOLS have come under fire from several quarters, including a House of Lords Select Committee in March, which found the safeguards “not fit for purpose”.

Liverpool solicitor Peter Edwards said: “I do not believe DOLS are an effective protection.

“They could be, if worked on, and it’s a relief that the Law Commission is looking at both areas [DOLS and the need for protection for those in supported living].”

The meaning of “deprivation of liberty” for those who lack mental capacity was broadened by Baroness Hale in the Supreme Court case of Cheshire West [2014] UKSC 19.

Edwards said that procedures to deprive people of their liberty were set out by DOLS, but that an appeal would take about a year and cost £30,000-£50,000. For people in supported living, permission needs to be sought from the Court of Protection before they can be deprived of liberty—a cumbersome process.

“What we need is a clear procedure with lots of safeguards where an individual can appeal through a cheap, accessible tribunal mechanism,” he said.

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll