header-logo header-logo

09 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Does the early bird catch the worm?

Cautious welcome for new early conciliation employment procedures

Employment lawyers have given a cautious welcome to new early conciliation procedures.

Under the new system, prospective claimants register their dispute with ACAS, which then investigates whether early conciliation can be achieved. It came into force on 6 April, and becomes mandatory on 5 May. Applicants will not be allowed to lodge a claim with the tribunal unless they have a certificate from ACAS showing early conciliation was not possible.

Early conciliation will be free of charge. By contrast, employment tribunal issue and hearing fees were introduced last April, resulting in a dramatic 79% decrease in claims.

Christina Tolvas-Vincent, partner, Bond Dickinson, says: “Early conciliation is a hurdle for the employee to jump over before they go to the tribunal, and because there is no incentive for them, there may be occasions where the employee or employer will not engage.

“Employers may know that there has been a decrease in claims since fees were introduced, and may think, why enter into negotiations when the fee may deter a claim. But, we do know that ACAS resolve an awful lot of disputes. 

“Pre-claim conciliation [a voluntary forerunner to the new system] has existed for several years and has been quite successful.”

Emma Hamnett, senior associate at Clarke Willmott, says actual participation in conciliation will remain entirely voluntary. ACAS can make “reasonable attempts” to contact the defendant, although it is not yet clear what will count as “reasonable”, she says. 

If the defendant cannot be reached, or declines to take part, then ACAS will issue an early conciliation certificate. The period for early conciliation is one month from receipt of the form, although a 14-day extension can be granted if both parties agree.

Hamnett says: “There is no uncertainty around time limits but unrepresented claimants could end up missing deadlines, and the respondent’s solicitors will run that point, so there could be satellite litigation around that.

“The new system is not going to encourage more people to bring their claims but it might encourage early conciliation. You can’t force people to negotiate against their will.”

 

Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll