header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011 / Emma Davies
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Doctor, doctor

Emma Davies prescribes a regulatory health check

There has been a spate of recent announcements from the coalition government regarding reducing the regulatory burden on businesses, including  the Red Tape Challenge where once a fortnight, the government invites comments on regulations affecting a particular sector (manufacturing is next), in the hope of simplifying or even removing those posing the greatest burden.

Alongside this, there is an ongoing consultation on health and safety laws, and the “One-In-One-Out” policy requires the impact of any proposed regulation to be calculated, and before it can be introduced, requires the repeal of any equally costly existing regulation. This ensures that any new regulations are cost-neutral for businesses in terms of compliance. The caveat to this is that not every business is equally affected by every regulation—so the net effect for some businesses may be less neutral than for others.

But there are some areas where it is likely that regulation will always remain—principally where safety is concerned—and rather than reducing regulation in these areas, the government intends that these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll