header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

Vulnerable child witness, Unfit witnesses, Cross border regulators

CHILD WITNESSES

The position concerning child witnesses is always a difficult one. An older child may undeniably be capable of giving reliable and cogent evidence in many cases. However, the process of giving evidence, especially the procedure of cross examination, can prove traumatic to a vulnerable child. There is good research evidence to show that adverse effects could befall some children if they are called to give evidence, especially in cases involving allegations of sexual abuse. A court is therefore required to exercise great caution before summoning a child witness. In LM (A Child) (2007) EWCA Civ 9, the Court of Appeal considered how a trial judge should deal with this issue.

L is 10 years of age. In May 2005, L’s mother alleged that L had been physically abused by her father when drunk. When interviewed by the police in the presence of a social worker L had alleged that her father had physically and sexually abused her and also that he had been violent to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll