header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

27 April 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Vulnerable child witness, Unfit witnesses, Cross border regulators

CHILD WITNESSES

The position concerning child witnesses is always a difficult one. An older child may undeniably be capable of giving reliable and cogent evidence in many cases. However, the process of giving evidence, especially the procedure of cross examination, can prove traumatic to a vulnerable child. There is good research evidence to show that adverse effects could befall some children if they are called to give evidence, especially in cases involving allegations of sexual abuse. A court is therefore required to exercise great caution before summoning a child witness. In LM (A Child) (2007) EWCA Civ 9, the Court of Appeal considered how a trial judge should deal with this issue.

L is 10 years of age. In May 2005, L’s mother alleged that L had been physically abused by her father when drunk. When interviewed by the police in the presence of a social worker L had alleged that her father had physically and sexually abused her and also that he had been violent to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll