header-logo header-logo

02 March 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

False witness dilemmas, Importance of reasoned conclusions, Judicial review of council decisions

COMPLAINANT CREDIBILITY

The problem of false witness is especially acute where intimate situations are concerned when accounts by independent witnesses may be lacking. In those instances the behaviour of the complainant or victim may assume paramount importance. Two recent cases bearing on this issue came to the attention of the courts in different circumstances.

In R v Soroya [2006] EWCA Crim 3120, [2006] All ER (D) 152 (Dec) the appellant had been convicted of rape. He had also been acquitted of indecently assaulting the same complainant two days before the rape. He appealed on the ground that the complainant had given a false account of a earlier sexual attack on her and also that her actions since the trial raised doubts about her credibility, in that she had swiftly formed a relationship with a wealthy employer many years her senior, in circumstances similar to those in which she had met the appellant.

Motivation

The complainant was a Polish woman aged 19 who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll