header-logo header-logo

Doc brief

18 October 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

NO FAULT TRAGEDY >>
HIDDEN VIOLENCE >>
CONFLICT IN CHILD PROTECTION >>
INTERIM DISCIPLINE >>

NO FAULT TRAGEDY

In Sutcliffe v BMI Healthcare Ltd (2007) EWCA Civ 476, Mr Sutcliffe had been a keen amateur rugby football player, aged 33, who underwent a routine operation on his injured knee. The operation was performed successfully and he appeared to be making an uneventful recovery—although naturally suffering pain which he controlled through standard self-administered doses of morphine. He spent a sleepless night and fell asleep at 6.00am, when the decision was taken to let him sleep undisturbed. At 8.15am he still seemed to be in untroubled sleep. At some point thereafter he appears to have vomited and, whereas the normal reaction would have been to have woken up, coughed and removed any obstruction to the airways, Mr Sutcliffe’s reactions, perhaps dulled by the morphine, had been impaired with the consequence that the vomited matter had entered his lungs, obstructing the flow of oxygen. As a consequence he suffered massive brain damage from which he will not recover.

Breaches in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll