header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

06 March 2008 / B. Mahendra
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Mental health
printer mail-detail

COMPETING RIGHTS
SCIENCE v FACTS
POST-DISCIPLINE SANCTIONS

FLYING UNSEEN

Most individuals are dependent on employment for their income. Illness of diverse kinds may impair the ability to work; the individual’s income may then become compromised and the law in many situations may begin to take an interest. This is usually the stuff of personal injury law, where employment prospects in the future—in the face of injuries sustained as a result of some tortious act—have to be studied with some care as any compensation payable must obviously reflect probable future loss.

In ancillary proceedings following divorce, the earning potential of ex-spouses is clearly a consideration especially where illness has afflicted one or both spouses. Lay persons often confuse recovery from illness with the full resumption of the capacity to work. The reality may be somewhat different. An individual may recover from some disorder but the prospects for his future employment may remain unclear and unpredictable. This situation played an important part in the Court of Appeal’s deliberations in v (

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll