header-logo header-logo

19 June 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

DIY justice

nlj_7657_robins

Jon Robins monitors the rise & rise of non-lawyers in the courtroom

Lawyers were reminded earlier this month how best to deal with some of the more alarming features of the new post-LASPO landscape, in particular the new generation of litigants-in-person and the burgeoning satellite industry of McKenzie Friends.

Guidelines

Lawyers were advised to adopt a “professional, co-operative and courteous approach at all times” in their dealings with unrepresented litigants, according to the new guidelines co-published by the Law Society, Bar Council, and Chartered Institute of Legal Executives. Such civility was extended even to lawyers’ latest bête noire, McKenzie friends. “The essential requirement of courtesy, as with any litigants in person, remains,” they added.

Well, up to a point. Lawyers were also told if McKenzie friends had the audacity to charge a fee higher than their own then this might be “a point that you might wish to draw to the court’s or the Litigant in Person’s (LiP’s) attention”. The chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Susan Jacklin QC, recently went so far as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll