header-logo header-logo

19 November 2013
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Divorce rate falling but financial trickery among separating couples on the increase

Results of Grant Thornton's annual matrimonial survey revealed

The divorce rate is falling due to the recession, new research has shown. 

However, couples are more likely to mislead each other by concealing their assets when they do separate—only 9% of family lawyers surveyed in Grant Thornton UK’s tenth annual matrimonial study have not had cases which revealed missing or concealed assets, compared to 20% last year and the year before.

Chris Clements, partner, forensic and investigation services, Grant Thornton UK, says: “Concealment is clearly a major issue as is illustrated by the recent public cases of Prest v Petrodel [2013] UKSC 34 and the ongoing Young v Young matter. 

“What is clear is that concealment, particularly in corporates, will require detailed analysis of the financial records in order to confirm the true position.”

Geraldine Morris, head of family at LexisPSL, says: “It's no surprise that divorces are being delayed in the current economic climate; with high cost of living, increasing property prices and low wage rises many families are feeling under significant financial pressure, a pressure that would be increased further if resources were stretched across two households rather than one. 

“Regarding concealment of assets, while the number of cases may not have increased, the ability to throw light on such assets was significantly eroded by the Court of Appeal in Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908 when it reversed the Hildebrand rules previously been relied on by parties and their advisers in cases where it was alleged that the spouse/civil partner would not fully disclose their financial circumstances and one party had taken and copied their spouses/civil partners documents—that practice is no longer permitted and a possible further consequence is the apparent increase of enforcement action in relation to a non-disclosing party, including imprisonment as in the high profile case of Young v Young.”

The 40s are the most separation-prone decade for couples, and the main reason for divorce is “falling out of love”.

Nearly one quarter of the 85 leading family lawyers taking part in the survey said their most pressing issue was litigants in person, which are increasingly common due to cuts in legal aid and public funding for advice centres.

Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll