header-logo header-logo

17 June 2020
Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Divorce Bill victory

Three decades of campaigning for no-fault divorce came to fruition this week as the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill cleared its final parliamentary stages

The Bill received support from all sides of the House. Several amendments were tabled but either withdrawn or defeated. Once the law is in force, couples seeking divorce will no longer need to assign blame.

Family lawyers’ group Resolution’s national chair Margaret Heathcote said the new law would mean lawyers are ‘better able to support couples to resolve matters as constructively and amicably as possible, minimising the impact on any children they may have’.

Former chair and long-time campaigner Nigel Shepherd said: ‘This is the biggest reform of divorce laws in England and Wales in over 50 years, demonstrating just how outdated and old-fashioned fault-based divorce is.

‘We worked closely with the Ministry of Justice on this Bill and look forward to continuing to work with them to implement the new law as soon as possible so that we can start helping separating families more effectively.’

Law Society president Simon Davis also welcomed the ‘long overdue’ reform.

‘We have long argued the notice period should begin when the divorce application is received by the respondent rather than when the divorce is applied for―ensuring both partners are on the same page from the start and have sufficient time to seek the legal and financial advice they need.’

Emma Collins, partner at national law firm Weightmans, said:  ‘Divorce law has long since been out of date with the times in which we live and hampered swift and cost-effective settlements. As a result, family lawyers have had to find constructive ways of moving cases forward despite of the law rather than with its assistance.

‘Reform to bring the law in line with society and day to day legal practice is long overdue and we welcome an end to spouses having to apportion blame if they wish to divorce, which will inevitably reduce unnecessary conflict between separating couples.’

Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll