header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Divorce—Ancillary relief—Financial provision

Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, [2011] All ER (D) 231 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Nicholas Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ, 28 Jan 2011

The Court of Appeal has overruled the decision in GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) EWHC 611 (Fam) [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May).

Martin Pointer QC and Geoffrey Kingscote (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the wife.

Lucy Stone QC and Marcus Lazarides (instructed by Levison Meltzer Pigott) for the husband.

The parties married in 1996 when the husband was the sole owner of a company which had been in operation for 10 years. They separated in 2006 and a decree absolute of divorce was made in the wife’s favour. She commenced proceedings for ancillary relief. While those proceedings were underway the husband sold the company for £25m. The net assets of the parties at the date of the hearing was £25m. The wife’s claim was for a lump sum payment by the husband of £10m. She conceded that the husband’s ownership

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll