header-logo header-logo

21 October 2011 / Laura Bednall
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Distant relatives

Laura Bednall tells a cautionary tale of international surrogacy

As increasing numbers of people across the globe are turning to surrogacy agreements to fulfil their hope of having a family, governments and courts are finding they need to reassess the policies and legislation which govern the regulation of surrogacy agreements. While surrogacy has been propelled into the media through high-profile court decisions and celebrity endorsement, the existing legislation has been far outpaced by medical advances. It is becoming clear that our domestic law is not really suited to the escalating demand for surrogacy, particularly on an international scale.

Recently introduced legislation has, for the first time, provided same-sex couples and single people with the opportunity to start families of their own, resulting in a rapid expansion of the commercial surrogacy industry. Due to limitations of domestic law, international surrogacy agreements are proving to be the most convenient forum for many commissioning parents. This growth in international demand has seen the conflicting laws and practices of different countries create a legal minefield for commissioning parents in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll