header-logo header-logo

Dismissed or not dismissed?

08 February 2013 / Peter Taheri
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Has a recent High Court ruling created a new concept of accidental dismissal? Peter Taheri reports

In Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch), the claimant, having been demoted, claimed breach of contract while remaining in the trust’s employment. He was awarded only £98, as the High Court held he was wrongfully dismissed. Can that be right, when the employer had not purported to dismiss and the employee never claimed constructive dismissal?

Establishing the Hogg principle

Practitioners are familiar with the concept of constructive dismissal: the employer commits a repudiatory breach of the employment contract, in response to which the employee resigns. Perhaps less everyday is Hogg v Dover College [1990] ICR 39, EAT, where the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim succeeded even though he was still in the respondent’s employ. Understanding Hogg is pre-requisite for a discussion of Smith.

In Hogg, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that the employee “was being told that his former contract was from that moment gone”. To the employer’s argument

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll