Dishonest directors: no more easy escapes?

Sophia Purkis & Judith Davidge examine proposals to hold unscrupulous directors to account: do they go far enough?

The Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill intends to address the disparity which allows former directors of dissolved companies to escape investigation into their conduct.
The Bill is a step in the right direction, but it may not go far enough to deal with the actions of delinquent directors, and will not make much difference without more dedicated resources for the Insolvency Service.

The ability to dissolve companies without any formal insolvency process has long been used by the less than scrupulous to hide inappropriate behaviour. As the pandemic (hopefully) draws to an end, the government is seeking to take pre-emptive measures to tackle possible fraud arising from loans made to support companies during the pandemic and to deal with this issue.

The Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on 12 May 2021.

Policymakers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Dishonest directors: no more easy escapes?

Sophia Purkis & Judith Davidge examine proposals to hold unscrupulous directors to account: do they go far enough?

The Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill intends to address the disparity which allows former directors of dissolved companies to escape investigation into their conduct.
The Bill is a step in the right direction, but it may not go far enough to deal with the actions of delinquent directors, and will not make much difference without more dedicated resources for the Insolvency Service.

The Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on 12 May 2021.

Policymakers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations

The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment

NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law

Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes

NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession

The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself

NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap

A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’

NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads

Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design

Error message

Dishonest directors: no more easy escapes?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Switalskis—Grimsby

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury