header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012 / Adam Craggs
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Discovery channel

Adam Craggs analyses HMRC’s latest defeat in the First-tier Tribunal

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are able to raise what are colloquially called “discovery” assessments under s 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970). This is a topical issue at the moment among tax practitioners and there have been a number of important cases in recent months. The latest taxpayer to successfully challenge the validity of a discovery assessment is Anthony While (While v HMRC [2012] UKFTT 58 (TC)).

Background

Before considering While’s case, it may be helpful to remind ourselves of the relevant statutory provisions. As readers will be aware, under s 9A of TMA 1970, HMRC may enquire into a taxpayer’s self-assessment return if they notify the taxpayer of their intention to do so:

  • up to the end of the period of 12 months after the day on which the return was delivered if the return was delivered on or before the filing date;
  • up to and including the quarter day next following the first anniversary of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll