header-logo header-logo

04 December 2024
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Discount rate reset cuts long-term lump sum damages

The Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood has raised the personal injury discount rate (PIDR)—used by the courts to calculate lump sum awards for long-term injuries—from -0.25% to 0.5%.

The change, announced this week, is effective from 11 January 2025, and matches rates set in Northern Ireland and Scotland.

While the independent expert panel advising the Lord Chancellor recommended a rate between 0.5% and 1%, Mahmood considered ‘the likelihood of under-compensation with all rates above 0.5% to be too high’.

At 0.5%, ‘the three core claimants modelled will have, at least, an approximately 55% chance of receiving full compensation or more,’ she said, in her statement of reasons for the change.

‘They also each have no more than a 25% chance of significant under-compensation. At this rate, no core claimant is more likely to be undercompensated than over-compensated, which I consider an appropriate outcome.’

According to the Medical Defence Union (MDU), the change could save the NHS millions of pounds in compensation payments.

David Pranklin, MDU head of claims, said: ‘In recent years, changes in the PIDR have led to a huge increase in the cost of clinical negligence claims.

‘This has had serious implications for the NHS, and for MDU members who have been shouldered with the increased costs. This change will provide some relief in the current difficult medico-legal climate.’

However, Gordon Dalyell, treasurer of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, said: ‘Even under the current rate of -0.25 per cent, we know that a third of people with life-changing injuries will not meet the costs of their necessary care and support.

‘Any increase in the discount rate makes it more likely that more injured people will be undercompensated. People with catastrophic injuries are particularly susceptible to the rising costs of living we’re seeing across the board, which includes increases to carer wages and the cost of specialist aids and equipment.’

Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll