header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011 / Steven O'Sullivan
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Disclosure or discretion?

How closely should solicitors guard a purchaser’s file from the lender? Steven O’Sullivan reports

Recession and falling property prices bring repossessions, even with historically low interest rates. Lenders who sell property at a loss inevitably look to see if there is any way to recoup those losses. The buyer’s solicitor (who normally acts for the lender too), with compulsory professional indemnity insurance, is an obvious target. The first step is to request the solicitor’s file. How should a solicitor respond to such a request? Should the file be handed over lock, stock and barrel?

The default position is that, absent the borrower’s consent or prima facie evidence of borrower fraud, the solicitor should not disclose the parts of the file that are privileged and/or confidential to the borrower. See para 8(c) of the SRA’s Guidance to rule 4 of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 and Nationwide BS v Various Solicitors [1999] PNLR52, per Blackburne J who held that “it was the lawyer’s duty to claim privilege on behalf of the client or former

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll