header-logo header-logo

27 October 2016
Issue: 7720 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Disbursements funder’s claim fails

A disbursements funder has lost its claim for repayment in a case concerning a law firm that failed to perform its professional duties.

Impact Funding Solutions v AIG Europe Insurance (formerly known as Chartis Insurance (UK)) [2016] UKSC 57 concerned the construction of an exclusion clause in a professional indemnity policy relating to “loss in connection with any claim”.

Impact had a disbursements funding master agreement with solicitors, Barrington Support Services, now insolvent. Impact provided funds to Barrington to hold on behalf of clients pursuing industrial deafness claims. However, Barrington failed to adequately investigate the merits of their claims. This meant Barrington’s clients could not repay their loans to Impact.

Delivering the lead judgment, Lord Hodge held that the clause did apply. He said: “Excluding such a claim creates no incoherence in the policy, as it is the combination of the opening clause and the exclusions that delimits AIG’s contractual liability.”

Issue: 7720 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll