header-logo header-logo

21 June 2018
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Digital law for low incomes

Blockchain & AI could play role in ensuring access to justice

The technological revolution is proceeding at pace in the commercial sphere of the law but ‘spluttering in the field of access to justice’, according to a report into social justice and technology.

Despite restricted funding, however, there are hopeful signs with interesting projects taking place around the globe. The Legal Education Foundation report, Digital delivery of legal services to people on low incomes, published this week, surveys the highlights of the past 12 months.

Written by NLJ columnist and former Justice director Roger Smith, the report notes that social justice projects have focused on relatively low-level use of technology, for example, online chat replacing face-to-face contact.

More innovative technology such as blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) could play a role in certain access to justice situations, Smith says, for example, blockchain could be used to help refugees establish their identity. While commercial law firms are keen to investigate the potential of AI and blockchain and investors flock to fintech start-ups, however, social justice organisations cannot invest the same level of funds.

Smith assesses the most important developments in the past 12 months as being increased use of interactive websites and ‘the extension of assisted document self-assembly of which two really good examples come from England and Wales—www.seap.org.uk/services/c-app and www.advicenow.org.uk/pip-tool.

‘They relate to interactive guidance on applying for a disability benefit, a personal independence payment. The material helps the user to compile a case for the benefit and to understand the conditions that they must meet.’

Issue: 7798 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll