header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013 / Paul Letman
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Difficult facts making bad law

istock_000012676713large

Paul Letman analyses a recent landmark decision on residential service charges

The High Court’s decision in Phillips v Francis [2012] EWHC 3650 (Ch) changes the established approach to consultation under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) in respect of qualifying works, defined as works on a building or any other premises to the costs of which a tenant may be required to contribute by payment of a service charge (see s 20(2)).

The change

Before this decision, the received approach to the question of whether to consult or not under LTA 1985—before amendment by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) —followed the Court of Appeal decision in Martin v Maryland [1999] 2 EGLR 53. In that case, Robert Walker LJ laid down what he described as “a common sense” approach to deciding how, if at all, to divide up works for the purpose of deciding whether a landlord should have complied with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of those works.

Essentially, the old approach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll