header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007 / David Brock
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Opinion , Regulatory , Property
printer mail-detail

Democratic development?

David Brock questions the Barker report’s implications for government and economics

The Barker Review of Land Use Planning—Final Report—Recommendations (the Barker report), was published on 5 December 2006, the day before the Pre-Budget Report (PBR), Investing in Britain’s Potential: Building our Long-Term Future (Cm 6984). The Chancellor, Gordon Brown, commissioned the review in 2005, surprising many, coming just a year after the major changes to the planning system wrought by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (PCPA 2004)—changes born of criticism that planning was holding back economic growth.

The Chancellor’s wider agenda, probably most recently stated by him in the PBR, “drives forward the great economic mission of our time—to meet the global challenge, to unleash the potential of all British people, so that the British economy outperforms our competitors—and deliver[s] security, prosperity, and fairness for all.”

Despite press comment on green belts, the most important recommendations are on the plan-led system; the role of economics in planning; streamlining the new system; and the role of the secretary of state in planning decisions,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll