16 December 2011 / Carol Storer

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus

printer

mail-detail

Delaying the inevitable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Does the government’s new schedule for legal aid reform provide hope or just delay? Carol Storer reports

The government has announced a delay in implementing the legal aid reforms. Does this mean that it has concerns over the passage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill? Or is it simply a sensible scheduling decision?

Originally, the government hoped to bring in the cuts in civil categories next October. However, the LASPO Bill will only become an Act at the earliest in March 2012, assuming it is passed in some shape or form. The Ministry of Justice refers to family and civil contracts being offered in April 2013.

Current civil contracts would have to be terminated early. Civil non-family contracts are due to expire in November 2013, while the new family (and family with housing) contracts start in February 2012 and expire in November 2013. If the government cannot meet the civil timetable, it can let the contracts continue to November rather than terminate early.

The Bill is now in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Delaying the inevitable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Does the government’s new schedule for legal aid reform provide hope or just delay? Carol Storer reports

The government has announced a delay in implementing the legal aid reforms. Does this mean that it has concerns over the passage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill? Or is it simply a sensible scheduling decision?

Originally, the government hoped to bring in the cuts in civil categories next October. However, the LASPO Bill will only become an Act at the earliest in March 2012, assuming it is passed in some shape or form. The Ministry of Justice refers to family and civil contracts being offered in April 2013.

Current civil contracts would have to be terminated early. Civil non-family contracts are due to expire in November 2013, while the new family (and family with housing) contracts start in February 2012 and expire in November 2013. If the government cannot meet the civil timetable, it can let the contracts continue to November rather than terminate early.

The Bill is now in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS

NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations

The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment

NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law

Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes

NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession

The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself

NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap

A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’

NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads

Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design

back-to-top-scroll